"One license makes multiple games" doesn't even seem like a semantic argument to me. Where's the confusion? As far as I can tell, Mesozoic brought up the BattleTech/Mechwarrior argument because of the frankly inane anti-competitive point. Like, as long as Microsoft isn't simultaneously pushing a BattleTech simulator, real-time strategy game, aerospace sim, Mac port, RPG, 2D and 3D fighting game, platform shooter and breakfast cereal, then they're just keeping the man down.

Was that the anti-competitive point, or did I read it incorrectly?